Published 2001
by California State Auditor, Bureau of State Audits in Sacramento .
Written in English
Edition Notes
| Contributions | California. Legislature. Senate. Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review., California. Legislature. Senate. Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review. Subcommittee No. 1 - Education. |
| Classifications | |
|---|---|
| LC Classifications | HJ2051 .C25 2001 |
| The Physical Object | |
| Pagination | 4 v. ; |
| ID Numbers | |
| Open Library | OL4016340M |
| LC Control Number | 2001387021 |
Implementation of State Auditor's Recommendations - Classified by Auditee On this page we provide links, classified by entity name, to summaries of audit and investigative reports we issued during the previous two years that relate to each entity. 14 California State Auditor Report To ensure effective and efficient operations, the department should continue to address the recommendation of our prior audits, especially the recommendations regarding the long-term viability of the Cal-Vet program. been taken. The Bureau of State Audits’ (bureau) policy requests that auditees provide a written response to the audit findings and recommendations before the audit report is initially issued publicly. As a follow-up, we request the auditee to respond at least three times subsequently: at . View the summary of each audit report and the status of the auditee's implementation of the State Auditor's recommendations for each report by clicking on the report title. Introduction: The purpose of each audit report summary is to identify what actions, if any, auditees have taken in response to our findings and recommendations.
Implementation of State Auditor’s Recommendations February Report No. Audits Released in and implementation ofthe recommendations made by the State Auditor'sOffice. The 9 agency and 1university audit reports were selected for follow-upprocedures after a review ofprior year performance audit . Offi ce of the Auditor. The missions of the Offi ce of the Auditor are assigned by the Hawai‘i State Constitution (Article VII, Section 10). The primary mission is to conduct post audits of the transactions, accounts, programs, and performance of public agencies. This is a report on our follow-up review of the implementation of audit recommendations made to various entities in calendar year We conducted our work pursuant to Section , Hawai‘i Revised Statutes, which requires the Auditor to report to the Legislature on each recommendation that the Auditor has made that is more than one year old.
The revision of the Yellow Book is effective for financial audits, attestation engagements, and reviews of financial statements for periods ending on or after J , and for performance audits beginning on or after July 1, Early implementation is not permitted. This is the fourth annual report that JLARC has released on the status of recommendations to the Legislature made by the State Auditor's performance audits. 1. This JLARC report provides information on the implementation status of the specific recommendations to the Legislature in those two new audits. that auditees provide a written response to the audit findings and recommendations before the audit report is initially issued publicly. As a follow-up, we request the auditee to respond at least three times subsequently: at 60 days, six months, and one year after the . of State Auditor’s Recommendations A Report to the Governor and the Legislature of the State of Hawai‘i Report on the Implementation of State Auditor’s Recommendations Report No. , February This is a report on the follow-up review of the implementation of audit State Auditor.
